Open access journal of forensic psychology

 

section editor:  Anita Schlank  anita.schlank@earthlink.com


Please see 9/20/09 announcement.


Schlank, A. (2010). Introduction to the section on Sex Offenders. Open Access Journal of Forensic Psychology, 2, 1-5.

Schlank 2010.pdf                       2010-Schlank.pdf


Campbell, T. W., & DeClue, G. (2010). Flying blind with naked factors: Problems and pitfalls in adjusted-actuarial sex-offender risk assessment. Open Access Journal of Forensic Psychology, 2, 75-101.

Campbell & DeClue 2010.pdf


Campbell, T. W., & DeClue, G. (2010). Maximizing predictive accuracy in sexually violent predator evaluations. Open Access Journal of Forensic Psychology, 2, 148-232.

Campbell & DeClue-2 2010.pdf


Wilson, R. J., & Looman, J. (2010). What can we reasonably expect to accomplish in conducting actuarial risk assessments with sexual offenders in civil commitment settings? A response to Campbell and DeClue: “Maximizing predictive accuracy in sexually violent predator evaluations.” Open Access Journal of Forensic Psychology, 2, 306-321.

Wilson 2010.pdf

DeClue, G., & Campbell, T. W. (2010). Still maximizing accuracy in sexually violent predator evaluations. Open Access Journal of Forensic Psychology, 2, 322-336.

DeClue2 2010.pdf

Campbell, T. W. (2010). Maximizing accuracy and welcoming scrutiny: An additional response to Wilson and Looman. Open Access Journal of Forensic Psychology, 2, 337-346.

Campbell3 2010.pdf

Wilson, R. J. (2010). Upholding accuracy and ethical practice in assessing the reoffense risk of sexual offenders using actuarial instruments: A rejoinder to Campbell. Open Access Journal of Forensic Psychology, 2, 353-358.

Wilson2 2010.pdf

Pake, D. R., Jr. & Wilson, R. J. (2010). Normative data set for evaluating civilly committed sexual offenders using the Denial and Minimization Scale (DAMS). Open Access Journal of Forensic Psychology, 2, 379-395.

Pake 2010.pdf   


DeClue, G., Madsen, E. M., Kline, S. M., Montaldi, D. F., Boccaccini, M., & Murrie, D. (2011). Frequency distributions of Static-99 and Static-99R scores in several recent United States samples. Open Access Journal of Forensic Psychology, 3, 30-64.

DeClue 2011-2.pdf


Campbell, T. W. (2011). Predictive accuracy of Static-99R and Static-2002R. Open Access Journal of Forensic Psychology, 3, 82-106.

Campbell 2011.pdf

Online-Friendly Presentation of Tables in Campbell 2011.pdf


Krivacska, J., & Margolis, H. (2011). Reliability of sex-offense risk assessments at civil commitment: Threshold levels in New Jersey SVP proceedings. Open Access Journal of Forensic Psychology, 3, 107-148.

Krivacska 2011.pdf    


Donaldson, T. S., Abbott, B. R., & Michie, C. (2012). Problems with the Static-99R prediction estimates and confidence intervals. Open Access Journal of Forensic Psychology, 4, 1-23.     

Donaldson 2012.pdf


DeClue, G. (2013). Years of predicting dangerously. Open Access Journal of Forensic Psychology, 5, 16-28.

DeClue 2013.pdf

DeClue, G., & Campbell, T. W. (2013). Calibration performance indicators for the Static-99R: 2013 update. Open Access Journal of Forensic Psychology, 5, 81-88.

DeClue & Campbell 2013.pdf


Abbott, B. R. (2013). The utility of assessing “external risk factors” when selecting Static-99R reference groups. Open Access Journal of Forensic Psychology, 5, 89-118.

Abbott 2013.pdf

DeClue, G., & Zavodny, D. L. (2013). Forensic use of the Static-99R: Part 3. Choosing a comparison group. Open Access Journal of Forensic Psychology, 5, 151-181.

DeClue and Zavodny 2013.pdf